Component structure
The coating cures from a single packaged component; film formation relies on the resin technology inside the product rather than a hardener reaction at the factory.
TECHNICAL GUIDE · COATING SYSTEM SPECIFICATION
Component structure · Mixing · Application · Production control
1K and 2K describe how a coating system is supplied and cured, not which one is universally better. The appropriate structure depends on the substrate, finish target, application process, drying requirements and production conditions.
System selection depends on the substrate, finish requirement and production conditions — confirmed for each project before specification or production use.
The choice between a one-component and a two-component coating system affects more than the product on the shelf. It influences primer selection, mixing discipline, application workflow, usable working time, drying and handling windows, and how repeatable the finish is across production.
Primer and topcoat compatibility
Mixing and pot-life discipline
Application workflow and operator skill
Drying and handling windows
Finish and appearance requirements
Repeatability across production batches
For a B2B specification, 1K vs 2K is a system-design decision — not a simple product upgrade.
A 1K (one-component) system is supplied ready to use or ready to thin, without a separately metered hardener. Because there is no mixing step, 1K systems are generally simpler to run, easier to train operators on, and more tolerant of variation in day-to-day production conditions.
The coating cures from a single packaged component; film formation relies on the resin technology inside the product rather than a hardener reaction at the factory.
No hardener metering, no induction time, and no pot-life constraint — which reduces a common source of process error.
1K systems can be appropriate where process simplicity, shorter working windows and operator flexibility matter — subject to the required finish and end-use performance.
Where the substrate is relatively well prepared, the finish requirement is defined, and the production environment benefits from a simpler process.
A 2K (two-component) system combines the coating with a separate hardener before application. The hardener participates in a crosslinking reaction during curing, which changes how the film develops — and adds a controlled mixing step to the production process.
The coating component and the hardener are supplied separately and combined at a defined ratio shortly before application.
The mixing ratio is product- and system-specific. Some Lotus 2K systems use a dedicated hardener (for example, LH5), and different products may specify different ratios such as 15%, 20% or 25%. These are not universal mixing rules — the technical documentation or technical discussion defines the correct ratio for each system.
Once mixed, a 2K system has a usable working window. Material mixed beyond that window can no longer be used as intended, which is a production-planning consideration rather than a product defect.
2K systems place more weight on correct metering, mixing, timing and operator discipline — which is why they are typically evaluated during a factory trial rather than assumed from a data sheet.
The comparison below is a system-selection framework, not a ranking. Neither structure is universally better; each is appropriate under different conditions.
| Dimension | 1K system | 2K system |
|---|---|---|
| Component structure | Single packaged component | Coating + separate hardener |
| Mixing | No hardener metering required | Defined ratio; product- and system-specific |
| Working time | No pot-life constraint from mixing | Limited working window after mixing |
| Application workflow | Simpler; easier operator training | Requires metering, mixing and timing discipline |
| Production control | Fewer process variables | More variables to control; typically validated by factory trial |
| Drying / handling | Defined per product and system | Crosslinking cure; windows defined per product and system |
| Finish requirements | Selected against the required finish | May be selected where the project requires a higher-performance structure |
| Intended use | Where requirements are met by a 1K structure | Where evaluation shows a 2K structure is appropriate |
| Factory conditions | Tolerant of simpler setups | Benefits from controlled mixing and application conditions |
| Documentation | System TDS and application guidance | System TDS plus defined mixing-ratio and handling requirements |
This table describes system structures in general terms. Specific performance depends on the product, substrate, film build and process — and should be confirmed for the actual system under evaluation.
Selection starts from the requirement, not from the chemistry label. A practical evaluation considers the following inputs together.
Material, surface condition and preparation requirements — including pinholes, absorption or adhesion constraints.
Colour, gloss level, appearance direction and any decorative effect required.
Spray, brush or roller; equipment condition; operator experience and training requirement.
Line speed, mixing capability, working-time tolerance and batch size.
Required surface-dry and pack/handling windows within the factory's actual schedule.
Indoor or outdoor use, surface-wear expectations and any buyer-specified performance criteria.
The proposed structure is validated on the actual substrate and approved as the reference.
The system is evaluated under real equipment and production conditions before deployment.
The approved system is controlled against the approved reference across batches and operators.
The examples below describe how a system structure is typically approached for different Lotus coating applications. They are directional examples, not specifications — the confirmed system is defined per project after substrate evaluation.
Wood coating systems may use 1K or 2K structures depending on the substrate, finish target and production context. A 2K structure may be evaluated where the project requires a higher-performance finish build.
Composite surfaces with pinholes or imperfections may require a 2K primer for additional surface build, while relatively prepared surfaces may be served by a 1K primer. Topcoat and clear selection follows the finish requirement.
Wood-look systems are built on the actual substrate — steel, cement-based, cement board or composite — so the primer and base structure may be 1K or 2K depending on the substrate, while the decorative grain and finishing layers are developed for the target appearance.
Primer selection is evaluated against absorption, moisture and surface condition; topcoat and clear structures are selected against indoor or outdoor use and the required finish.
No system structure should be copied between substrates or projects without evaluation. The examples describe the selection logic, not a fixed recipe.
The 1K/2K decision is validated inside the same Lotus workflow used for every coating system.
Requirement → Substrate evaluation → System selection → Sample → Approval → Factory trial → Production → Reproduction
A system that performs on a sample still needs to be evaluated under the actual equipment, mixing and production conditions before deployment.
The useful specification question is not which structure is stronger, but which coating system is appropriate for the substrate, finish, process and production requirement. A simpler 1K system that matches the requirement and the factory's real process can be the more reliable specification than a nominally higher-performance system run under uncontrolled conditions.
System selection should follow the substrate, not a generic preference for one structure.
Mixing ratio, working time and operator discipline are part of the system — they change the result as much as the product name.
The approved sample and the factory trial define whether the structure is appropriate — not the label.
No. 1K and 2K describe how a system is supplied and cured, not a universal quality ranking. The appropriate structure depends on the substrate, finish requirement, application process and production conditions.
No. Different products and systems may specify different ratios — for example 15%, 20% or 25%, and some systems use a dedicated hardener such as LH5. The correct ratio is defined by the relevant technical documentation or technical discussion for each system.
Drying and curing behaviour is defined per product and system rather than by the 1K/2K label alone. Surface-dry and handling windows should be confirmed from the system's technical documentation and validated under the factory's actual conditions.
No. Substrate condition, preparation and adhesion requirements differ between wood, composite, cement-based and metal substrates. The system is selected against the actual substrate and confirmed by evaluation.
Provide the product, substrate, target finish, indoor or outdoor use, application method and production context. Lotus can evaluate the requirement and propose a system direction for sampling and factory trial.
No. A 2K system adds mixing and working-time variables, which makes the factory trial more — not less — relevant. The approved system should be validated under actual production conditions.
Send the product and substrate information, target finish, application method and production context. Lotus can review the requirement and define the next step for sampling or factory trial.